From: LOdell
Sent:
Saturday, 2 February 2008 12:16 AM
To: disabdis
Subject:
Re.Tempoary Exemption Re Disability Standards.
To Whom it may concern.
As a driver in the Taxi industry. I find it hard to
understand the reason for a request to be exempt from supplying a satisfactory
service to clients who are in wheelchairs due to some medical or inherited
cause.
The MSLs (Minimum Service Levels) were discussed
and agreed to between the two Taxi Councils (Queensland and Western Australia)
when the Taxi Service Contract was draw up for those states.
These are not service levels that cannot be reached
as most taxi companies can get very close to the service level
required.
The DOT (Department of Transport) in its Licence
agreement with the operators of these types of vehicles state that the Operator
and the Driver must give preference to M50 (Wheelchair) clients.
There are penalties for those that
don't.
The company can set in place a equitable system for
its M50 units to work by. So that all the units do a equal amount of the
work.However it is the drivers and operators that don't want to comply with the
requirements. For several reasons.
They have in there meters a tarrif that is higher
than the standard taxi fare and that is when they carry 6 or more clients.The
use of this tarrif increases the fare by 50%. If they are carrying a M50 client
who has six or more friends travelling with them. Only the standard fare may be
applied.
So the drivers and operators would naturally opt
for the more lucrative and financially rewarding six or more client fares than
the M50 fare.
Here in the far north of Queensland. The company
have noted that over several months we carried "X" number of M50 clients. Which
equated to 60 clients per car per month or 2 clients per day. So each of
our M50 units was required to carry 60 clients per month.A equal share of the
work load. However it was noted that in November 2007, a total of 70% of these
units did less than the required number of jobs.
The DOT. Has the power to remove the authority to
operate and or own one of these licences if the operator and his/her drivers
fail to maintain or comply with the requirements of their licence agreement and
terms. Which is to give preference to M50 clients.
If the Queensland Taxi Council and the West
Australian Taxi Council seek to be temporarily exempt from the requirements on
behalf of their members.After having had these types of units in their fleets
for several years. Due to their alleged inability to comply with or to ensure
compliance with the requirements now. How are they going to be able to do
that after the requested five year exemption period is
over.
They need to bite the bullet and get on with the
job of ensuring that the clients in the various taxi company areas get the
standard of service that they should be entitled to,the same as any other
transport user.
There are other reasons for not allowing this
request. To many to put on paper at this time.
L.M.Odell.
T.W.U. Del.
B & W Taxis. Cairns.