Human Rights and Euthanasia
Examine human rights perspectives on voluntary assisted dying in Australia, including key debates, ethical considerations, and legal frameworks affecting
Summary
Euthanasia, or voluntary assisted suicide, has been the subject of much moral, religious, philosophical, legal and human rights debate in Australia. At the core of this debate is how to reconcile competing values: the desire of individuals to choose to die with dignity when suffering, and the need to uphold the inherent right to life of every person, as recognised by article 6(1) of the ICCPR.
Human Rights and Euthanasia
Euthanasia, or voluntary assisted suicide, has been the subject of much moral, religious, philosophical, legal and human rights debate in Australia. At the core of this debate is how to reconcile competing values: the desire of individuals to choose to die with dignity when suffering, and the need to uphold the inherent right to life of every person, as recognised by article 6(1) of the ICCPR .
Several legislative attempts have been made to legalise euthanasia in parts of Australia. However, at present, it remains unlawful.
One of these attempts was the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 (NT), which allowed for medically assisted voluntary euthanasia at the request of a terminally ill person. This Act is discussed in Human Rights and Euthanasia , an occasional paper which examines the relationship between euthanasia and international human rights law (see below). Shortly after this paper was published, the federal Parliament made Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 (NT) inoperative by amending the Federal Parliament of the Northern Territory (Self-Government) Act 1978 (Cth).
Current projects
The Australian Human Rights Commission does not have any current projects on euthanasia and human rights.
Past projects and publications
Euthanasia, Human Rights and the Law, 2016
This issues paper explores voluntary euthanasia. It is not intended to be exhaustive, however it aims to add to considerations of this very complex and sensitive topic through analysis of the domestic regulatory environment relating to both passive and active forms of voluntary euthanasia, and of relevant international laws by way of comparison with domestic regulation. It concludes with a human rights-based analysis of voluntary euthanasia and some commentary on the practice informed by human rights principles.
To read the 2016 report click here
Human Rights and Euthanasia, Occasional Paper, December 1996
In 1996, the Human Rights Unit released Human Rights and Euthanasia, a paper which seeks to promote informed public discussion of issues surrounding the legal regulation of euthanasia and in particular the relevance of international human rights norms to that debate. The paper reflects the state of law and policy as at December 1996.
The position of international human rights law with respect to voluntary euthanasia is not explicit or clearly defined. Article 6(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) provides: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
The impact of article 6(1) on voluntary euthanasia raises a number of questions including the scope of the right to life, the interpretation of 'arbitrary' deprivation of life and the definition of life and in particular when life ends.
