Skip to main content

Compulsory Retirement

Learn about age discrimination and compulsory retirement in the Australian workplace through our research, findings and recommendations for reform.

Human rights Report to the Minister December, 2012

This page is archived

You are in an archived section of the website. This information may not be current. This page was first created in December, 2012.

Summary

This report deals with complaints by four pilots who were compulsorily retired at age 60 from their employment with a major airline. The complainants submitted that the decision, taken pursuant to company policy, constituted discrimination on the ground of age . The respondent submitted that the age restriction was an inherent requirement of the job based on safety and operational considerations and did not amount to discrimination. Attempts to conciliate the complaints were unsuccessful.

Compulsory Retirement

Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Report No.1 - August 1996

This report deals with complaints by four pilots who were compulsorily retired at age 60 from their employment with a major airline. The complainants submitted that the decision, taken pursuant to company policy, constituted discrimination on the ground of age . The respondent submitted that the age restriction was an inherent requirement of the job based on safety and operational considerations and did not amount to discrimination. Attempts to conciliate the complaints were unsuccessful.

The Human Rights Commissioner found that the policy of compulsory retirement upon attaining the age of 60 constituted discrimination on the basis of age. He found it not to be an inherent requirement of the job of an airline pilot that he or she be under the age of 60. He recommended, among other things, that compensation be paid to the complainants and the airline discontinue its policy of compulsory retirement of pilots and other employees at age 60.

Compulsory retirement restricts equal opportunity on the basis of age. The Human Rights Commissioner recommended the repeal of compulsory retirement provisions in the Public Service Act 1922 and in other federal legislation. He also recommended that the Commonwealth legislate to provide a comprehensive national prohibition of age discrimination.

Downloads

PDF (83K), Word (93K).

You might also like

AZ v The Commonwealth (Department of Home Affairs) (2018)

Human rights
Report to the Minister
21 June 2018

Mr BF on behalf of Master BG v Commonwealth of Australia (DIBP) (2017)

Human rights
Report to the Minister
21 June 2017

9 Vietnamese men in immigration detention v Commonwealth of Australia

Human rights
Report to the Minister
29 November 2017

Abdellatif v Commonwealth (DIBP)

Human rights
Report to the Minister
4 September 2014

AH v Commonwealth of Australia (DIBP)

Human rights
Report to the Minister
1 December 2014

AI v Commonwealth of Australia (DIBP)

Human rights
Report to the Minister
29 February 2016

Have a question about discrimination or sexual harassment? Want to know more about human rights? Contact us if you need help.

Contact us
Subscribe to our mailing list to join a community of human rights advocates, and stay in the loop about our latest updates.