-
Any marked deterioration in a juvenile’s physical or mental health or behaviour be notified to the family or the next of kin who should be invited to participate in supportive care and case planning. [9:207]
-
That non-compliance with the requirements in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child should be limited to cases genuinely relating to the best interests of the juvenile or geographic necessity.[9:207]
-
State Government Departments responsible for juvenile justice fund a regularly updated loose leaf juvenile justice sentencing service for magistrates. The service would give the necessary details of Aboriginal bodies involved in the rehabilitation of young people or juveniles and individuals willing (and considered fit and proper) to take part as a mentors, elders or guardians. [9:210]
-
Post-death investigations and inquests be legally required for deaths of people in all forms of institutional care, such as mental institutions which cater for involuntary patients. [10:224]
-
The Queensland Attorney General appoint a State Coroner or a Coroner responsible for deaths in custody.[10:225]
-
Attorneys General provide appropriate funding for Coroner Offices to ensure the proper preparation of inquests and the thorough investigation of deaths, and ensure that transcripts are made available to interested bodies. [10:225]
-
All jurisdictions, but especially Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania develop protocols for the conduct of coronial inquiries in cases of deaths in custody.[10:226]
-
In Queensland and other jurisdictions the Coroner inquiring into a death in custody must be a Stipendiary Magistrate or more senior judicial officer, appointed by the Attorney General. [10:226]
-
Jurisdictions which do not require immediate notification of death by custodial authorities to the Coroner amend their relevant legislation or protocols. [10:227]
-
In cases where there is evidence a person has committed an indictable offence Coroners should continue to examine the circumstances of the case and make appropriate recommendations addressing systemic problems. [10:228]
-
All jurisdictions should require the making and retention of full public records of coronial inquests.[10:228]
-
Coroners fully consider the circumstances of deaths in custody including the circumstances of arrest and imprisonment. [10:230]
-
There be a restriction on the right of witnesses at Coronial investigations to claim privilege in respect of testimony which may incriminate or tend to incriminate the witness. Suitable restriction on the use to which such evidence can be put is necessary to maintain the substance of the protection against self-incrimination. [10:230]
-
Jurisdictions which restrict coroners’ powers to make findings and recommendations, by stipulating that recommendations must be only be made where they will prevent occurrences of a similar nature in the future, should expand the powers given to coroners in line with section 19(2) of the Coroners Act 1985 (Vic) and with Royal Commission Recommendations 13 and 18. [10:233]
-
Aboriginal investigative staff must be employed by coroners in each jurisdiction. Such staff should be responsible only to the state or territory coroner for the reporting of investigation outcomes.[10:242]
-
The Queensland Police Service report on the measures adopted to implement the recommendations made by the Criminal Justice Commission investigator enquiring into the death of the woman at the Brisbane Watch house in 1992. All other jurisdictions report on their compliance with those recommendations in their forthcoming implementation reports.[10:244]
-
Chapter 11 of the Queensland Custody Manual be amended to provide practical guidelines and instruction to appropriate members of the Queensland Police Service in the thorough and impartial investigation of deaths in custody. [10:244]
-
Western Australia and other jurisdictions which have not done so consult with appropriate Aboriginal organisations such as Aboriginal Legal Services and develop protocols which cover such matters as: the retention of bodies so that the family can sight the body where possible; the retention of organs; the retention of clothing worn by the deceased; the notification of the family; the appropriate explanation of the coronial process to family members; and referral of the family for counselling. [10:247]
-
An independent forensic expert must be provided to assist the family, with the cost borne by the authority most closely connected with the circumstances of the death. Funeral costs should also be borne by the relevant authority. [10:247]
-
State Police Departments publish regular statistics on, and analysis of, the incidence use of arrest, summons and court attendance notices to back up claims of implementation. The research should be conducted to reveal variations between districts, and should convey ethnicity and charge information. [11:261]
-
All government departments and agencies should record and publish statistical or other objective data relevant to the implementation of all Royal Commission recommendations for which that department or agency has responsibility. Annual targets should be set by reference to such statistics or data to provide a measure of effective implementation or otherwise. [11:261]
-
State and Territory Governments use standard terminology (‘implemented,’ ‘part implemented’ or ‘not implemented’) in their reports, and support these claims with appropriate evidence drawn from their own records and data from other agencies with direct involvement. Three examples of interested agencies who should provide supporting evidence in the criminal justice area are the State and Territory Ombudsmen or equivalent, Anti-Discrimination Commission or equivalent, the Bureau of Crime Statistics and the Office of the Auditor-General. [11:268]
-
State and Territory Governments acknowledge the shortcomings in their reporting on implementation of Royal Commission recommendations, and commit to the model of comprehensive Action Plans by responsible departments (similar to those provided for in Part 3 of the Disability Discrimination Act (Cth) 1992). Interested Aboriginal organisations should be invited to comment as part of the process in the drafting of these action plans. [11:268]
-
Commonwealth, State and Territory Attorneys General Departments move immediately to enact recommendations appropriate for legislative implementation. The Commonwealth Law Reform Commission should take a lead to co-ordinate the drafting of either model state and territory legislation or model uniform legislation which complies with the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody.[11:278]
-
Aboriginal Justice Advisory Committees in the States and Territories, as well as the National Aboriginal Justice Advisory Committee, be given the research support they need to provide adequate Indigenous input into the review and drafting of state criminal laws, and at the same time participate in the process of preparing a Criminal Code for the Commonwealth. [11:279]
-
State Governments and Police Services should accept liability for deliberate acts of violence by police through legislation which specifically extends vicarious liability to assaults by police officers. [11:289]
-
State and Territory Law Reform Commissions review the appropriateness of legal barriers to civil actions against police and prisons. [12:289]
-
The New South Wales Government immediately re-introduce victims compensation for prisoners criminally injured while incarcerated in New South Wales prisons. [12:297]
-
In states where a strict limitation of actions period applies, legislation be amended to provide that the basic limitation period may be waived where a court determines that, in all the circumstances, it is just to so waive it. [12:298]
-
The fact that a legal claim relating to a death in custody is statute barred by the lapse of time should not be an acceptable ground for State or Territory Governments to refuse to make an ex gratia payment in a case relating to the implementation of Royal Commission recommendations. [12:298]
-
The South Australian initiative, where a senior Aboriginal person works from the Department of State Aboriginal Affairs as an Ombudsman, should be used as a model by all State and Territory Governments. That position should be supported by express statutory powers. [12:303]
-
The Ombudsmen in each jurisdiction should be given an express role in the monitoring of recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody. Ombudsmen must be given powers and adequate resources to fulfil this function. [12:303]
-
State Coroners must immediately be guaranteed conditions equivalent to those of a District Court Judge, including tenure, so as to ensure that judicial independence is achieved in this important jurisdiction. [12:307]
-
A statutory duty must be placed on coroners ensuring that they address a wider range of specified matters in cases of deaths in custody, such as Royal Commission Recommendation 12 which requires investigation of not only the cause and circumstances of death, but also the quality of care, treatment and supervision of the deceased prior to death. [12:307]
-
All state and territory governments should legislate to provide that visiting justices or magistrates adjudicate all charges laid against prisoners relating to offences alleged to have been committed while in prison. [12:308]
-
Any review of Aboriginal Legal Services should address matters of wilful misconduct or operational efficiency, but should ensure as a priority that services currently provided to Aboriginal people are not unfairly withdrawn.[12:312]
-
The funding of legal services should be provided on a basis which is adequate and at least equivalent to the funding provided to Legal Aid Commissions for an equivalent case load. Specific attention should be paid to funding for the purposes of obtaining psychiatric reports and court transcripts. [12:312]