Site navigation

Change font size: SmallerLargerReload

Race Discrimination navigation

 case study 5turning research findings into copy - a process of selection

Introduction:

  • interpretation of complex research findings, surveys, and polls in news stories

Reports:

Comment:

Please note that none of the reports in the case studies have been the subject of complaints or queries under the Racial Hatred Act.


The Federation of Ethnic Communities Councils of Australia (FECCA) comments on what it sees as the harm done to communities through the use of loaded language and offensive terminology:

 "Quotation Mark"

The articles on Healy's report use words incorrectly, for example 'ghettos'. Other inflammatory words such as 'rorts', 'abusers' and 'bogus' are used in a manner that appears to be aimed at instilling a sense of outrage in the reader.

The use of terms such as 'chronic welfare recipients' are more loaded than 'long-term recipients' and also seem to suggest at least an unsolvable problem.

The articles infer there is something unsavoury about various ethnic groups concentrating in a particular area. While the 1991 Census indicated that 11 per cent of the Fairfield population was born in Vietnam, nowhere near the proportions the article seems to imply, no effort is made to explain the reasons people of a particular birthplace group would want to live near each other. Some of these reasons are: the distribution of cheaper housing, initial place of arrival, the desire to be close to family members and others from their home country and the likelihood of more appropriate services in areas where there are higher numbers of people from their birthplace.

While the unemployment rates for a number of the communities stated is high, these are related to a range of factors, which are not explained in the articles, and the rate tends to decline with length of settlement.

 "Quotation Mark"

FECCA illustrates how news stories on research such as that presented in Ernest Healy's report could be more balanced, accurate, and sensitive to racial issues:

  • less use of inflammatory language, in this case 'rorts' and 'bogus'
  • avoidance of inaccurate use of terminology, eg. 'ghettos'
  • inclusion of other academic views regarding the issues raised in the research and a more thorough and accurate use of data
  • some exploration of the issues confronting the communities in question, such as the Vietnamese, when they arrive in Australia and why they might settle in particular areas
  • inclusion of a community, Mayoral or Ministerial perspective
  • less use of unpublished data and unnamed sources; it's pretty difficult for the reader to critique something that is unsighted and essentially unavailable.

Previous page | Top of this page | Main Contents | Next page